ImagineArt shipped a platform that's years ahead of what most AI tools can do. The storytelling hasn't caught up. The Soul Department is being built to fix that: a small serious team that owns the company's point of view, posture, and taste, and briefs the rest of the house to make it real. A taste engine, not a content team.
We're hiring six writers, thinkers & critics.
The keeper of the worldview. You own the voice document, edit every writer on the team without erasing them, and say the final yes or no on whether a piece of work sounds like us. A rare hire. Non-negotiable.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Make the house style unmistakable."
02The Rambler
Essays, keynote scripts, deep-dive videos, the one piece a year that defines the year. You think in arcs and pay off in conclusions. You've written fiction, especially fiction, and non-fiction, and the muscle shows in everything you touch.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Write the thing people screenshot a year later."
03The Dopamine Hit
Captions, hooks, headlines, taglines, the one line that makes a Reel work. You think in rhythm, inversion, and punchlines. You understand memes as language, not just as content, and your sense of humor is sharp enough to land without becoming a liability.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Fewer words. More weight. Funnier."
04The Antenna
The antenna. You live on X, Reddit, Discord, Substack, and four places nobody else on the team has found yet. You read novels and watch films because AI culture isn't the only culture. Every Monday you ship one tight brief that every other person reads before they open their laptop.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Tell us what's coming, not what just happened."
05The Diagnostician
Not a consultant, a teammate. You sit with the writers, the researcher, the ideator, and explain why things spread, stick, or die. You've taken theory and actually used it on real work, with measurable proof that something improved because you were involved. Half scientist, half editor.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Know why it worked. Show the receipts."
06The Critic
Anthropology, sociology, or history background. Experience optional. What's not optional is the instinct to take a SaaS product, a trend, a film, a subculture, and break down why it worked, who it served, and what it said about the moment it arrived in. A social commentator by disposition, not by job title. You make us smarter about what we're part of.
You've probably
Not a fit if
"Explain the present. Then tell us what it means."
Write between 550 and 600 words. No AI. Plain text. Start with one clear heading that names the role you want, then answer the question for that role.
Word count: 550 and 600 words.
AI: No AI.
Format: Plain text.
Structure: Role heading, then answer.
The question for each role
Editor-in-Chief
Name a writer or piece of writing that is widely considered excellent, that you believe is actually overrated and why. Then name one that is under-appreciated and why you think so. 250 words each. Be specific. Quote lines, point at passages, say what the emperor isn't wearing.
Long-Form Writer
Write a 500-word review of something you love that most people don't know exists. A book, a film, a restaurant, a board game, a specific park bench, a 1987 commercial, anything. Assume your reader hasn't heard of it. Your goal is not to convince them to check it out. Your goal is to make them finish the piece.
Short-Form Writer
Here are five pieces of content that exist. Write a headline, caption, and tagline for each that would make it work on a social feed. Your copy, not an analysis. Two sentences max per attempt, plus one sentence on why your version would land. The five:
(1) a new AI feature that lets you edit video by typing what you want to change;
(2) a short film about a grandmother who learns to use TikTok to find her estranged son;
(3) a tweet from the official account of a major chain restaurant;
(4) a book titled "The Ninth Decade" about slow institutional decay;
(5) a thread announcing a small music festival in a small town, headliner unknown. Fifteen sentences total. No more.
Cultural Researcher
What's one thing currently being talked about online that you believe is already over, and one thing nobody's talking about yet that you believe is about to matter? Tell us why you're right about both.
Attention Engineer / Behavioral Psychologist
Pick a piece of content that went viral in the last six months and that you believe shouldn't have, given what we know about attention. Explain what actually happened, using whatever frameworks you find useful, and where the consensus explanation gets it wrong.
Social Commentator
Choose any one product, piece of media, or cultural moment from the last five years and write its obituary, as if it's already dead and we're reading about what it meant when it mattered. 400 words for the obituary, 100 for why you picked it.
One more thing. Be specific. Talk about actual things, actual names, actual lines, actual moments. No blanket statements. "AI is revolutionary" tells us nothing. "AI sucks" tells us nothing. What tells us something is pointing at the exact thing you mean and saying what's true about it.
We don't mind bad grammar and lousy punctuation. (We do. But we'll keep that aside.) What we actually care about is whether the 550 to 600 words sound like a person thought about them.
If your submission is shortlisted, we'll ask for a resume, portfolio, and writing samples. Not before. The 550 to 600 words are how we read you first.